A private party successful sues for antitrust violations. Which of the following is not something the private party (as opposed to the government) can recover from their suit? Damages Attorney's fees Imprisonment of the defendant Treble damages Question 15 (1 point) Guinness (a beer brewer) was introduced to the world in 1759. They are currently one of the world's most popular brands of beers. Their factories offer tours to the public, where visitors are shown how the beer is brewed from start to finish. How are they most likely protecting their intellectual property? Assume for this question that US laws apply (even though it's an Irish company) and that all of the below intellectual property protections existed in 1759. Trade Secret Patent Copyright Trademark The director of a corporation knows that the corporation is planning a merger in the near future (that has not yet been announced). So in December. 2021, the director purchases stock in the corporation (20 shares at $5 each). After the merger goes through in April 2022, the director sells those shares at 520 each. For which of the following could the director be liable? Insider trading under 10(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Short-swing trading under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Both insider trading and short-swing trading None of the above Question 17 (1 point) Same fact pattern as the question above (re-pasted for ease). The director of a corporation knows that the corporation is planning a merger in the near future (that has not yot been announced). So in December, 2021, the director purchases stock in the corporation (20 shares at $5 each). After the merger goes through in April 2022, the director sells those shares at $20 each. If the director were found liable for short-swing trading, what would the director have to pay back to the corporation? $100 5400 $300 5200