A Question of EthicsThe IDDR Approach and Complaints.John Verble worked as a financial advisor for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC. After nearly seven years, Verble was fired. He filed a suit in a federal district court against his ex-employer. In his complaint, Verble alleged that he had learned of illegal activity by Morgan Stanley and its clients. He claimed that he had reported the activity to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and that he was fired in retaliation. His complaint contained no additional facts.

[Verble v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, 676 Fed.Appx. 421 (6th Cir. 2017)]

Please write the summary using the template then answer the questions.

• Facts.

The background story: what happened in the real world cause the parties to go to court to resolve their dispute.

• Law.

References to relevant legal principles, precedent, statutes, the Constitution, or other sources of guidance for determining the outcome of the case.

• Analysis.

Weaving together facts and relevant law, the judge decides the outcome of the case (holding) and explains the reasoning.

• Resolution.

The ruling of the court.

Sources