A Question of EthicsWorkers Compensation. Beverly Tull had worked for Atchison Leather Products, Inc., for ten years when she began to complain of hand, wrist, and shoulder pain. Atchison recommended that she contact a certain physician. In April 2000, the physician diagnosed the condition as carpal tunnel syndrome severe enough for surgery. In August, Tull filed a claim with the state workers compensation board. Because Atchison changed workers compensation insurance companies every year, a dispute arose as to which company should pay Tulls claim. Fearing liability, no insurer would authorize treatment, and Tull was forced to delay surgery until December. The board granted her temporary total disability benefits for the subsequent six weeks that she missed work. On April 23, 2002, Berger Co. bought Atchison. The new employer adjusted Tulls work to be less demanding and stressful, but she continued to suffer pain. In July, a physician diagnosed her condition as permanent. The board granted her permanent partial disability benefits. By May 2005, the bickering over the financial responsibility for Tulls claim involved five insurersfour of which had each covered Atchison for a single year and one of which covered Berger. [Tull v. Atchison Leather Products, Inc., 37 Kan.App.2d 87, 150 P.3d 316 (2007)] (See Health, Safety, and Income Security.)

1. When an injured employee files a claim for workers compensation, there is a proceeding to assess the injury and determine the amount of compensation. Should a dispute between insurers over the payment of the claim be resolved in the same proceeding? Why or why not?
2. The board designated April 23, 2002, as the date of Tulls injury. What is the reason for determining the date of a workers injury? Should the board in this case have selected this date or a different date? Why?
3. How should the board assess liability for the payment of Tulls medical expenses and disability benefits? Would it be appropriate to impose joint and several liability on the insurers (making them each liable for all of the damages), or should the individual liability of each of them be determined? Explain.