A researcher wants to determine if facets of emotional judgment predict counselor self-efficacy among professional counselors. Three scales of the Emotional Judgment Inventory (EJI) are used to measure one's perceived skill in understanding and using emotions effectively. Higher scores on the EJI scales reflect better emotional judgment. The three EJI scales used are: (1) Identifying Own Emotions (idslf), (2) Expressing Emotions Adaptively (expres) and (3) Managing Others' Emotions (mngothr). The total score of the Counseling Self-Estimate Inventory (COSE) was used to measure counselor self-efficacy (cosetot). Higher scores on the COSE reflect more perceived counseling self-efficacy. The study sample was comprised of 118 counselors. The researcher used a sequential MRA entering the predictor variables in the following order: (First) Identifying Own Emotions (idslf), (Second) Expressing Emotions Adaptively (expres) and (Third) Managing Others' Emotions (mngothr). Please use an alpha of = .05 for all analyses. For the a priori power analysis using F tests>Linear multiple regression: Fixed model, R2 increase, the previous effect size Partial R2 = .10 (use in the Determine window and calculate and transfer to main window), = .05, power = .80, Number of tested predictors = 3, Total number of predictors = 3.

The R Square Change in Model 3 only relates to the Managing Others' Emotions variable that was added to the model. Was the R Square Change significant for the addition of Managing Others' Emotions?

answer choices

No, the R Square Change = .000 was not significant, F_change (1,114) = .005, p = .944, so p > .05. The added variance from Managing Others' Emotions did not significantly contribute to the model.

Yes, the R Square Change = .062 was significant, F_change (1,114) = .005, p = .944 so p < .05. The added variance from Managing Others' Emotions did significantly contribute to the model.

The ANOVA table shows that the Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3 are all significant. Is it accurate to say that the reason that Model 3 is significant is because of the predictors of Identifying Own Emotions and Expressing Emotions Adaptively are significant with little to no help from Managing Others' Emotions?

answer choices

True

False

The Coefficients table provides information about testing the significance of each predictor variable by itself to counseling self-efficacy using t-tests. Was Identifying Own Emotions significant in predicting counseling self-efficacy as indicated in Model 3?

answer choices

Yes, t = 4.261, p = .000, so p < .05

No, t = 4.261, p = .000, so p >.05

Was Expressing Emotions Adaptively significant in predicting counseling self-efficacy as indicated in Model 3?

answer choices

Yes, t = 2.942, p = .004, so p < .05

No, t = 2.942, p = .004, so p >.05