Question
A researcher wants to estimate the percentage of people in some population who have used illegal drugs, by conducting a survey. Concerned that a lot
A researcher wants to estimate the percentage of people in some population who have
used illegal drugs, by conducting a survey. Concerned that a lot of people would lie
when asked a sensitive question like "Have you ever used illegal drugs?", the researcher
uses a method known as randomized response. A hat is filled with slips of paper, each
of which says either "I have used illegal drugs" or "I have not used illegal drugs". Let p
be the proportion of slips of paper that say "I have used illegal drugs" (p is chosen by
the researcher in advance).
Each participant chooses a random slip of paper from the hat and answers (truthfully)
"yes" or "no" to whether the statement on that slip is true. The slip is then returned
to the hat. The researcher does not know which type of slip the participant had. Let
y be the probability that a participant will say "yes", and d be the probability that a
participant has used illegal drugs.
(a) Find y, in terms of d and p.
(b) What would be the worst possible choice of p that the researcher could make in
designing the survey? Explain.
(c) Now consider the following alternative system. Suppose that proportion p of the slips
of paper say "I have used illegal drugs", but that now the remaining 1
(a) There are two crimson jars (labeled C1 and C2) and two mauve jars (labeled M1 and
M2). Each jar contains a mixture of green gummi bears and red gummi bears. Show by
example that it is possible that C1 has a much higher percentage of green gummi bears
than M1, and C2 has a much higher percentage of green gummi bears than M2, yet if
the contents of C1 and C2 are merged into a new jar and likewise for M1 and M2, then
the combination of C1 and C2 has a lower percentage of green gummi bears than the
combination of M1 and M2.
(b) Explain how (a) relates to Simpson's paradox, both intuitively and by explicitly
defining events A, B, C as in the statement of Simpson's paradox.
52. As explained in this chapter, Simpson's paradox says that it is possible to have events
A, B, C such that P(A|B,C)
P(A|B) > P(A|Bc).
(a) Can Simpson's paradox occur if A and B are independent? If so, give a concrete
example (with both numbers and an interpretation); if not, prove that it is impossible.
(b) Can Simpson's paradox occur if A and C are independent? If so, give a concrete
example (with both numbers and an interpretation); if not, prove that it is impossible.
(c) Can Simpson's paradox occur if B and C are independent? If so, give a concrete
example (with both numbers and an interpretation); if not, prove that it is impossible.
53.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started