A researcher was interested in studying the effects of job insecurity on employee job attitudes. Half of the research participants were randomly assigned to experience high insecurity (manipulated by announcing 50% layoffs) and half were assigned to experience low insecurity (announcement of 5% layoffs). In addition, the researcher was also interested in whether or not the method by which the layoffs were to occur would influence job attitudes and perceived fairness. Therefore, half of the research participants were assigned to a fair layoff condition (i.e., layoffs determined by job performance) and half were assigned to an unfair condition (i.e., layoffs determined by favoritism). Employees were asked to make ratings on several issues: how important their jobs were ("job importance"), the extent to which they intended to quit working for the organization ("turnover intentions"), their perceived chances of being laid off ("chances of being laid off"), and perceptions of fairness ("perceived fairness"). Finally, they were asked to decide whether they wanted to quit working for the organization or remain employed with the organization ("decision to quit"). Use the following data set gathered from these employees to answer all the questions on today's exam. 5 or 50% Layoff Fair/Unfair Job Condition Method Importance Turnover Intentions Chances of Being Laid Off 1 1 4 3 5 Perceived Fairness 7 Decision to Quit 1 1 1 1 2121 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1727 2 2 1 2 22222222 2 4132341412423323 3243432323626224221 75 10 5 5 5 75 10 75 10 75 50 50 25 50 50 50 3 50 2 25 212112 4 3 50 2 1 2555725257333252253 1 1 -22222-25 1 1 2 1 Coding Manual: Layoff Condition: 1 = 5% 2 = 50% Fairness Condition: 1 = Fair 2 = Unfair Decision to Quit: 1 = Quit 2 = Remain