A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted September 19-20 asked 1006 American adults whether they want the winner of the November presidential election to name a successor to Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the U.S. Supreme Court. The survey found that 624 adults agreed the vacancy should be filled by the winner of the November 3 presidential election. Do the poll results suggest that a majority of Americans think the next Supreme Court nominee should be chosen by the winner of the November presidential election?

1. Use the applet to find a p-value for this experiment. Explain how you do this, and include a screenshot that shows the relevant portion of the applet, including the null distribution. State the value of the p-value.
2. Based on the p-value, evaluate the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.
3. Interpret the p-value in context (i.e., the probability of what, assuming what?).
4. Calculate the value of the standardized statistic and include the appropriate symbol. Show your work.
5. Based on the standardized statistic, evaluate the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.
6. Interpret the standardized statistic.
7. Do the p-value and the standardized statistic lead to the same strength of evidence against the null hypothesis? Does this make sense? Why or why not?
8. State a conclusion in context and answer the research question.

I'm so sorry for so many questions but they're all connected to this One Proportion applet. Thank you in advance!