A Rhode Island state statute requires machinery in industrial plants to include automatic shut-off switches accessible to each employee working on the machine. Steel Company's equipment does not have the switches. Trudy, a steel employee, knew the dangers but went ahead and used the machines. Trudy suffers an injury that an accessible shut-off switch would have prevented. Trudy's best theory for recovery is based on? What 4 elements Trudy have to show? What's is Steel's best defense? Who do you think will win? Why