A rule utilitarian is driving a friend to the hospital. The friend has been seriously injured, and the time it will take to reach the hospital is critical. If the driver obeys the speed limits, the friend will probably not survive the trip. If the driver disobeys the speed limits, the friend will probably arrive at the hospital in time for emergency treatment. Under these circumstances, what is the driver most likely to do? O Disobey the speed limits regardless of the rule or the traffic, since this type of "rule" has no bearing on the situation and may therefore be disobeyed. O Obey the speed limits and hope for the best, since rules are to be abeyed in every circumstance. O Disobey the speed limits, but attempt to atone later by some act of penance. Decide how the greatest gad will be served, and make the driving decision on the basis of the greatest good. Even though there is a general rule of store decisis, in some situations a court may decide to change or modify a precedent. What would be an acceptable reason for doing so? The prior rule is out-of-date and not appropriate to present-day society The prior case is distinguishable because the facts are different in one or more significant details. O Sometimes (if rarely) the court who made the prior ruling was incorrect or wrong All of the above