A study compared three display panels used by air traffic controllers. Each display panel was tested for four different simulated emergency conditions. Twenty-four highly trained alt traffic controllers were used in the study. Two controllers were randomly assigned to each display panel emergency condition combination. The time in seconds) required to stabilize the emergency condition was recorded. The following table gives the resulting data and the JMP output of a two way ANOVA of the data Display Panel Emergency Condition 1 2 4 18 25 31 14 14 24 30 13 15 21 9 12 19 31 10 21 29 15 24 28 37 19 Last Squares Heans Estimates Panel Estimate Condition Estimate A 21.625000 1 17.333330 1.250ee 24.500000 25.625000 32.166670 4 13.333380 Analysis of Variance Sum of Source DI Squares Mode! 11 1,470.3333 Error 12 53.000 C. Total 23 1,523.3333 Hean Square 133.667 IF Ratio 30.2642 Prob) <.001- effect tests prev of next> Effect Tests Srce Panel Condition Panel Condition Man 2 3 Sum of Se 2 213.0833 31,230.3333 13.9767 24.67 3.4591 0.535 C0001 <.000 . tukey hsd all pairwise comparisons quantile adjusted df adjustment pane panel difference std error tute prob c louer lyri thatso condition trron probst .0001 c.0001 la per e glick here for the excel data file chemy make of display panels a b. and by using simultaneous percent confidence intervals your answers to decimal places. negative amounts should be indicated minus sign usc buc emergency conditions answer algn. prey next> in which display panel minimizes the time required to stabilize an emergency condition? Does your answer depend on the emergency condition? Why? segund to be an emergency condition action (g) Calcutate a 95 percent individual) confidence interval for the mean time required to stabilize emergency condition 4 using display panel B. (Round your answers to 2 de imal places.) Confidence interval