A substantial comment may include: 1. 3. 4. Sandel says that Kant and Bill Clinton both thought it was okay to tell misleading truths. According to the PDF, is this true (that misleading truths are morally acceptable), or is Kant being hypocritical (and misleading truths are actually lies)? Select a section of the PDF that supports your answer and explain why you think that is the case. In the case of the lifeboat described in Justice chapter 2, what would Kant think of the decision against the cabin boy? Would he think they made the right or wrong decision? Select a section of PDF that supports your answer and explain and defend your answer. You may refute and disagree with someone else's comment, but make sure to ground your disagreement in the PDF, not in your personal opinion. I want to see that you understand Kant, not that you agree with him. You may extend someone else's comment, making an original and substantive addition. Simply saying something along the lines of \"I agree" or "Good point" will receive no credit. You may ask a genuine clarifying question about a section of text. You must be specic in your question, and demonstrate an attempt to understand the selection. A generic question as \"What does he mean by this?" will receive no credit. Tell us what you think Kant means, but why you are unsure, or offer two (or more) possible interpretations of that section of text. a You may answer someone else's question, based on a textual citation. You may make any comment of substance. If you could copy and paste your comment to almost any piece of text in almost any piece of writing. it is not substantive. It should be specic and thoughtful. Examples of substantive comments include, but are not limited to: n Dniann nul- nnsanrltnun..- :. LL- nnr