[A] Suppose that the following milestones apply to a hypothetical based on Brodgen v Metro Railway. Brogden supplies coal to Metro on a regular basis. On May 23, Brogden and Metro negotiated a draft concerning the supply of coal. Suppose that the following transactions take place: April 2: Brogden shipped and Metro received 75,000 tons of coal May 2: Brogden shipped and Metro received 85,000 tons of coal May 24: Brogden shipped but Metro rejected the delivery of 65,000 tons of coal June 20: Brodgen shipped and Metro received the delivery of 45,000 tons of coal July 20: Brogden shipped and Metro received 50,000 tons of coal August 2: Brogden shipped and Metro received 125,000 tons of coal [1] On what date, if any, does an implied contract between Brogden and Metro come into force? (date) [ILO CI] (2 marks) [2] What, if any, would be the contractual liability of Metro to Brogden? Answer in aggregate tons: (number) [ILO B1] (2 marks) [3] What effect, if any, did the event of June 2 have on that contractual liability? Explain in terms of implied contact theory in one sentence only on the lines provided: [ILO CI] (1 marks) [4a] Identify the theory of the cause of action from the branch "Contracts" for Brogden's claim against Metro for non-contractual liability: three words) [A1/C1] (1 mark) [46] Identify the basis of recovery under that theory: mark) (max limit (max limit three words) [A1] (1 [5] Using data from [B3] below, determine damages payable using the above-identified theory & recovery basis: (number)