A Swiss NPO SNA sells faulty equipment to Finnish skier Anne who then has an accident and is crippled for life. Under EU Directive (fictitious and invented for this case only), compensation is due while the law transposing the directive to national law holds no compensation is due.

The QUESTION is if Anne starts proceedings in a Finnish court based on the EU directive to seek compensation, what rights or duties to seek clarification from the CJEU does the Finnish court have under TFEU Article 267?