A VENDING MESS 50 POINTS Robinson is a food vendor on 6th Street on the Howard University campus. He owns a number of the vending trucks and has two major competitors, Alice and Bob. Robinson was interested in getting control of as much of the Howard business as possible because he knew that no more licenses will be given out permitting vending operations on campus. Robinson entered intro written contracts with Alice and Bob to purchase their franchises for $ 5,000 each. At the time of contracting Alice also orally agreed that she would never compete with Robinson on the Howard University campus. Approximately a year after the agreement, however, Robinson discovered that Alice recently had reentered the business, selling goods from a truck on the east side of main campus. Robinson became concerned that Bob might resume business as well. Hence, he contacted Bob and they entered into the following agreement: June 15, 1998 1, Bob Wells, agree not to engage in any vending business on the campus of Howard University for five years. Bob Wells Last week (November 1998) Bob opened a new vending station across the street from Robinson's. Robinson is also having problems with Chuck. Two years ago (in 1996) he and Chuck entered into an oral agreement for Chuck to rent him a vending truck for "as long as Robinson stays in the vending business at Howard University in return for twenty percent of the profit from his sales at Howard University." They had shaken hands on the deal but Chuck now can get a better deal and refuses this month to give Robinson the truck, claiming that they never really had an enforceable contract since this agreement falls within the Statute of Frauds and has to be in writing. Discuss fully Robinson's rights against Alice, Bob, and Chuck