A woman was under custodial interrogation as a suspect in the murder of her boyfriend. When she entered the interrogation room, police gave her a pre-printed card with an accurate list of her Miranda rights. They told her to read the list out loud, which she did. They then asked her if she understood the right to remain silent and to have a lawyer present and she nodded affirmatively. She then refused to sign the card but did not ask for an attorney. During the next three hours they interrogated her and got few answers; she was largely silent but did respond at times with a "no" or "yes" or a nod of the head. Then one of the detectives asked her if he was ready to ask God for forgiveness for killing her boyfriend. She immediately burst into tears and shouted "yes." This opened further questioning leading to her admission of guilt. She would not sign a written confession or a waiver of the right to remain silent. She was arrested for murder and moved to suppress the confession.

Will the court suppress the confession as being involuntarily given?

	A.	Yes, the confession must be suppressed because she was questioned for over three hours, making anything she said essentially involuntary.
	B.	Yes, the use of religious deception to get a suspect to admit to crime renders the confession involuntary and is a violation of the suspect's First Amendment Rights.
	C.	No, the circumstances indicate a voluntary waiver because she understood that she could stop the questioning and get a lawyer but did not do so.
	D.	No, whenever a written list of Miranda warnings is given to a suspect and she doesn't ask for a lawyer, this is proof that the suspect fully understands her rights.