Abercrombie Cases 1. First case -- 2005. Would A&F have lost this case even if they could prove that their top management was not racist and had no intention of discriminating against minorities? Why did A&F permit the practices that occurred in this case? Do they have any strong defense available?

2. Second case - Khan v A&F. Here an employee was grievously insulted by a manager based on a "protected class" characteristic, but she lost the case? Why did she lose? What advice does this suggest for employees and for companies?

3. Third case -- Headscarf case. Here A&F loses again, several years after the first case. Why is A&F still losing this kind of case? Why didn't they learn from the first case? Do they have any legitimate defense?