About the law case Colosimo v Parker (2007) 8 NZELC 98,622

please help to analyse according to the following

1. Who was the plaintiff in this case? Who was the second plaintiff and who was

the defendant?

2. What institution decided the issue previously and what did this institution

order?

3. What institution is deciding the current dispute? What kind of "challenge" is it

and what is the plaintiff seeking?

4. What was undisputed in this case?

5. Why was it important for the defendant to establish that the first plaintiff was

his employer, and not the second plaintiff?

6. What did Judge Perkins find occurred in the conversation between Mrs Wade

and Mr Colosimo just after Easter 2004?

7. What happened after the conversation?