Abu created a new start-up company with the intent to create and sell flower vases. On March 1, 2022, before he began to sell flower vases, Abu filed an "intent-to-use" trademark application with the USPTO for the logo he wanted to use on his flower vases. Zulaikha owns a rival company and designed a logo identical to Abu's logo. On APRIL 1, 2022, Zulaikha filed for trademark registration with the USPTO and began selling flower vases imprinted with the logo. Abu began selling flower vases imprinted with the logo on August 1, 2022. Assuming the logo falls into a category of distinctiveness that the Copyright Act designates as immediately protectable by trademark if/when used on a product, which of the following statements is correct? (Also assume Abu never filed for an extension of the initial "intent-to-use" application deadline.) O The USPTO will grant Zulaikha's logo trademark protection as of APRIL 1, 2022 because she began using the logo on product before Abu; (the USPTO will not permit Abu to use the logo); O The USPTO will grant Abu's logo trademark protection, and his logo will be deemed protected as of March 1, 2022 (and Zulaikha will be deemed an infringer for ALL her use of the mark); O The USPTO will permit both Abu and Zulaikha to use the logo because Abu filed first, but Zulaikha began using the logo first; O The USPTO will grant Abu's logo trademark protection, and his logo will be deemed protected as of August 1, 2022 (and Zulaikha will be deemed an infringer for uses of the mark that occur on or after August 1, 2022 only