According to the case, which of the following is most true of Tata's response to the 2013 Companies Act? Tata Motors doubled its investment in R&D in order to overcome the "CSR Tax" that the Act imposed. Tata began to shift its CSR investments away from education and towards infrastructure that would benefit Tata Motors. Tata began to outsource jobs to cheaper labor markets. Tata began to systematically suppress its profits in order to avoid its CSR obligations. Tata devoted substantial spending to support for education in India