According to the witness for the company, there

select answer

a reasonable alternative design for the cleaner. If there is no alternative design for the product, most courts will engage in a

select answer

of the product. In this case, the court agreed with the company witnesses that the

select answer

outweigh the

select answer

$.$ If there is no way to reasonably prevent the harm through a safer design, then the manufacturer:

select answer

$.$ According to the court, this product

select answer

defective because of the design.