Adam was a passenger on a commuter train. At one point, Adam left his seat to use the restroom at the front of the train car he was in. While moving through the aisle, the car moved across intersecting tracks, causing the train car to hit a rock the engineer could not see, and Adam stumbled and bumped his knee. This aggravated pain Adam had with his knee that he had been treating with medication to reduce tenderness and pain. After the collision, Adam's doctors suggested he have surgery to his knee. Adam led a lawsuit against the train's operator and owner. At the conclusion of Adam's case in a jury trial, the defendants' attorneys move for a directed verdict. How should the court rule? 0 No answer text provided. 0 A. The court should grant the motion because Adam failed to prove the train operator's negligence. O B. The court should grant the motion if the train operator had produced evidence that a person of normal health would not have been injured as Adam was. 0 C. The court should deny the motion because the jury could nd that the train operator, a common carrier, breached its high duty of care to Adam, one of its passengers. 0 D. The court should deny the motion because the train operator's liability is not cut off because Adam's injuries were not reasonably foreseeable. Petrochemicals, Inc. designs and operates reneries in several states and manufactures a number of products. They operate in states throughout the west and southwest. The CEO and Board of Directors of Petrochemicals have their ofces in Dallas, and its IT and payroll are also located there. Petrochemicals hired PlantMasters to clean one of their operating plants located in Bakerseld, California. While cleaning the Bakerseld plant, one of PlantMasters' employees named Buck was scalded after a pipe burst carrying hot chemicals. ln Buck's tort lawsuit against Petrochemicals, he sought damages of $100,000. What is the likely result? 0 No answer text provided. 0 A. Petrochemicals should win because Buck's exclusive remedy is worker's compensation. O B. Petrochemicals should win because they did not owe a duty to Buck, who was an employee of an independent contractor. O C. Buck should win because of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. O D. Buck should win because Petrochemicals is strictly liable for Bucky's injuries