Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

add more relevant law and law sections. Also add relevant case law. Issue: Are Morris, Jordan, and AeroTech Solutions Pty Ltd liable to pay compensation

add more relevant law and law sections. Also add relevant case law.

Issue:

Are Morris, Jordan, and AeroTech Solutions Pty Ltd liable to pay compensation on the defective products that were formerly manufactured and sold by AeroCraft Pty Ltd?

Law:

Under the principal of corporate personality, a company is known as a separate legal entity from its shareholders. Nevertheless, in specific circumstances the courts can disregard the corporate veil, that involve activities that are fraudulent or where it is required to prevent injustice. The case of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd determined the foundational principal of corporate personality.

Application:

The invention of AeroTech Solutions Pty Ltd by Morris and Jordan as well as the transfer from AeroCraft Pty Ltd to the new entity suggest an attempt to limit liability by avoiding themselves from the possibility of legal consequences for defective products. Nevertheless, the mere invention of a new company doesn't necessarily absolve the original company or its directors of existing liabilities.

The courts could apply the doctrine of cutting the corporate veil if evidence is found for fraudulent intent or trying to escape legal responsibilities. If they find that AeroCraft Pty Ltd has intentionally manufactured and sold defective products, the directors could be held by the court for being personally liable for the actions of AeroCraft Pty Ltd.

Furthermore, in the consumer protection laws, if products are defective, customers could obtain compensation. Customers can also take legal action and obtain compensation against AeroCraft Pty Ltd if they find them liable.

Conclusion:

If there is evidence of fraudulent conduct or trying to escape legal responsibilities, Morris, Jordan, and AeroTech Solutions Pty Ltd will be at risk of being held liable for compensation. Customers of AeroCraft Pty Ltd could have justifications to engage in legal action against the original company for their defective products, the court could analyse the actions of the directors as well as the new entity.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Trusts Law

Authors: Charlie Webb, Tim Akkouh

5th Edition

113760672X, 978-1137606723

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Trace the history of banking and the Federal Reserve System.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

=+b) What were the factors and factor levels?

Answered: 1 week ago