adjustments (well 2 but none for denominator) 3. On the second page of the footnote for...

Transcribed Image Text:

adjustments (well 2 but none for denominator) 3. On the second page of the footnote for 2005, you notice that they refer to several convertible securities that would be antidilutive even in 2005 if they were included in the diluted EPS calculations. Why is that? 4 Looking at that second name some more notice the nart that save Stock optione excluded from the adjustments (well 2 but none for denominator) 3. On the second page of the footnote for 2005, you notice that they refer to several convertible securities that would be antidilutive even in 2005 if they were included in the diluted EPS calculations. Why is that? 4 Looking at that second name some more notice the nart that save Stock optione excluded from the