After analyzing the case, it is not required for Clean to replace the Window Sheen products because according to sections 1-202, 1-203 and 2-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code rules, Clean has supplied the goods at a reasonable time and on good faith. Also, under Uniform Commercial Coderules of conforming goods, Johnson has accepted the products as conforming goods and took the goods.

Since he has not inspected, there is no evidence that the products were frozen on delivery. There are chances that the cleaner would have been frozen in the garage storage facility. The reasons are unknown. Under Sections 2-513(1) and (2) of the UCC rules, the buyer has the right to inspect the goods. Since Johnson failed to do so, he cannot claim for a replacement.

Furthermore, under Section 2-601(a) of the Uniform Commercial Coderules, the rejection should be made within a reasonable time from the delivery of goods. Johnson inspected the goods three weeks later which is beyond the reasonable time of the delivery of goods. Hence, Johnson cannot claim for a replacement from Clean.

A. What if Johnson had immediately inspected the goods upon delivery and found they were frozen, what could he done about it?