After extensive hearings concerning abuses of senior citizens by the companies providing supplemental health insurance policies to Medicare patients, Congress passed a federal statute that prohibited health insurance providers from taking "unfair advantage" of Medicare patients. Concerned that a court might find the federal statute unconstitutionally vague, Congress urged the Association of Retired Persons (ARP) to bring a lawsuit in federal court testing the statute's constitutionality. If the ARP brings an action in federal district court to test the statute's constitutionality, will the federal court decide the case on the merits? Question 1 options: a) Yes, a constitutional case or controversy exists due to the opposing interests of the two parties, and both parties will adequately and fairly represent the conflicting interests at stake. b) Yes, and the court will declare the statute constitutional as it is within the power of Congress to promote the general welfare. c) No, because Congress has the power to invite anyone to challenge the validity of a federal statute. d) No, because there is no case or controversy for a court to determine