After reading Davis v. Washington consolidated with Hammonv. Indiana,

With respect to Davis v. Washington:

1. What statement did the prosecution want to put into evidence?
2. Why couldn't the prosecutor call the declarant to testify?
3. Did the Supreme Court determine that the statement was testimonial or non-testimonial? What was the basis of the Court's determination?

With respect to Hammon v. Indiana:

1. What statement did the prosecution want to put into evidence?
2. Why couldn't the prosecutor call the declarant to testify?
3. Did the Supreme Court determine that the statement was testimonial or non-testimonial? What was the basis of the Court's determination?

1. Based on this consolidated opinion, what factors should a judge be taking into account in deciding whether an out-of-court statement is testimonial or non-testimonial?