After reading the following business ethics dilemma fact pattern, please submit your recommendation as to the proper solution to this ethical dilemma. Since the fact pattern is general in nature, you may supplement the case with any additional facts that support your recommendation. Please be sure to state all assumptions you are making. No outside research, beyond your textbook, is required. Carefully state all issues involved, the legal and regulatory parameters affecting this dilemma, the various stakeholders affected with their respective interests, all possible courses of action or solutions available, and your final choice as to the proper solution, in your opinion, to this dilemma. There is no "correct" answer to this case. It is simply based on the assumptions you make to support your recommendation. While you will identify all possible courses of action, you must make a final recommendation supported by legal and ethical theories as well as your stated assumptions. ETHICAL DILEMMA #2 Monica Long was the product liability manager for the Cotter Ladder Company. One of Long's major headaches was liability exposure brought on by the product the company made: stepladders. Every year the Cotter Ladder Company was sued by persons who had fallen off Cotter-built ladders and sustained serious injuries; families would sue when loved ones were killed as a result of a fall. One aspect of her legal environment that baffled Long was that a consumer in California and a consumer in Florida could each fall off a Cotter ladder, sustain the same injuries, and yet the rules that governed whether they recovered or not were significantly different. This seemed unfair to both the injured consumers and to the Cotter Ladder Company. Why should it make a difference whether the consumer was injured in one state instead of another with respect to the consumer's ability to recover? Also, the crazy quilt of different state liability laws made it difficult for the cotter Ladder Company to predict its liability exposure. Long had heard that a federal product liability bill had been introduced in Congress. If passed, this bill would wipe out the different state product-liability laws and replace them with one law that would uniformly set product liability standards in all states. Thus, consumers injured in exactly the same way in different states would stand a good chance of having the same result in their cases. This seemed like equal justice to Long. Should she support the federal l product liability law? Please discuss the ethical implications associated with this decision. Your initial post should be submitted as an essay. Depending on the succinctness of your writing style, Five to Eight sentences should be necessary to fully explore the issues raised. Use proper citations with properly formatted references in your post.