After reviewing the application, I have highlighted several impermissible questions that shouldbe eliminated. Firstly, to prevent marital status discrimination, an applicant's maiden nameshould not be requested. Doing so has the potential to be considered sex discrimination,which is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Instead, I would address allcandidates by asking, "Have you ever worked under a different name?" Secondly, althoughasking for an applicant's social security number isn't off-limits, job seekers may be hesitant toprovide that data due to privacy concerns. To limit the risk of identity theft, I would suggestwaiting to collect such information until after a job offer has been accepted.The next issue I see is the inquiry concerning U.S. citizenship. The Immigration Reform andControl Act of 1986 outlaws hiring discrimination based on citizenship or immigration status.Furthermore, Title VII prohibits discrimination based on national origin. As such, I wouldexclude this question and replace it with a "statement that employment is subject to verificationof applicant's identity and employment eligibility under immigration laws," (Noe, 2022). Inaddition, questions about gender present another sensitive area. An applicant's sex is usuallynot job related and asking for that information could be a liability under Title VII (EqualEmployment Opportunity Commission, 2022). Considering that a bona fide occupationalqualification is unlikely, I would remove