After reviewing the Chapter $16$ case study, Dalcourt v$.$ Moyer

Did the subsequent amendment to the first inspection change the due diligence clause? What do you believe the parties were thinking when the encroachment issue on the boundary lines arose?

Last, provide your perspective on the case based on the following prompt:

What are some other areas that should be included in the "due diligence" process? What is the underlying purpose of the process?