After the client was injured, the cat which had scratched him escaped from the pet store; the cat was stuck by a car and injured. Upon being taken to the vet, it was discovered that the cat was not an adult domestic cat, but a wild mountain lion kitten that had been turned into the shelter a few days earlier. The shelter stated to the pet store that all the cats brought for adoption had been spayed or neutered and received all the appropriate shots and medical care. This mountain lion cub, had not been provided the promised care as it wasn't clear if it was a domestic cat. The city cited the pet store and shelter for unlawful possession of a dangerous animal. The cat was released to the wild before the vet knew it had attacked a human, so it is not available for further investigation. Attorney Files asked you to research whether or not the shelter should be named as an additional defendant to the suit. Write a business letter to the client. Provide a brief analysis of what you have discovered so far about the case Explain why the store and the shelter should or should not be named as a defendant, o Include the cause of action to be named against each defendant. Research the elements of a negligent tort in Massachusetts, and whether you think the involvement of a dangerous animal creates strict liability by either the store or the shelter. Explain any differences in damages available to the plaintiff based on the theory of the case against each defendant