Question
Age Species Cones Diameter TASB 9 Loblolly Yes 13.9 46.9 9 Loblolly No 19.5 74.8 7 Loblolly No 15.9 145.7 5 Loblolly Yes 12.0 50.6
Age | Species | Cones | Diameter | TASB |
9 | Loblolly | Yes | 13.9 | 46.9 |
9 | Loblolly | No | 19.5 | 74.8 |
7 | Loblolly | No | 15.9 | 145.7 |
5 | Loblolly | Yes | 12.0 | 50.6 |
14 | Loblolly | Yes | 16.9 | 88.5 |
6 | Loblolly | Yes | 5.1 | 57.8 |
16 | Loblolly | Yes | 23.3 | 77.9 |
6 | Loblolly | Yes | 11.1 | 47.0 |
17 | Loblolly | Yes | 27.0 | 142.0 |
5 | Loblolly | No | 12.3 | 83.4 |
14 | Loblolly | Yes | 13.7 | 62.0 |
14 | Loblolly | Yes | 19.7 | 100.9 |
9 | Loblolly | No | 12.2 | 50.3 |
14 | Loblolly | Yes | 22.1 | 78.3 |
15 | Loblolly | No | 23.0 | 93.7 |
25 | Loblolly | No | 29.4 | 188.6 |
8 | Loblolly | Yes | 18.0 | 38.4 |
24 | Loblolly | Yes | 37.1 | 213.7 |
12 | Loblolly | No | 13.1 | 59.4 |
2 | Loblolly | Yes | 5.3 | 45.4 |
5 | Slash | Yes | 13.1 | 68.7 |
21 | Slash | No | 35.2 | 251.9 |
8 | Slash | Yes | 12.2 | 81.2 |
17 | Slash | No | 27.8 | 109.9 |
4 | Slash | No | 7.0 | 69.2 |
18 | Slash | Yes | 29.1 | 200.6 |
12 | Slash | No | 30.0 | 133.1 |
11 | Slash | No | 22.4 | 170.4 |
12 | Slash | No | 25.5 | 120.0 |
15 | Slash | No | 28.4 | 148.3 |
3 | Slash | No | 21.0 | 159.7 |
21 | Slash | No | 28.1 | 193.2 |
6 | Slash | No | 17.3 | 138.0 |
11 | Slash | Yes | 22.7 | 88.7 |
15 | Slash | No | 25.2 | 153.8 |
7 | Slash | No | 13.2 | 73.4 |
15 | Slash | Yes | 26.1 | 138.4 |
2 | Slash | No | 9.2 | 73.2 |
14 | Slash | No | 8.9 | 54.1 |
6 | Slash | No | 21.3 | 54.2 |
10 | Slash | No | 20.3 | 44.7 |
12 | Slash | No | 18.3 | 119.0 |
3 | Slash | No | 16.7 | 23.4 |
7 | Slash | No | 10.7 | 66.2 |
8 | Slash | Yes | 14.7 | 107.3 |
10 | Slash | Yes | 19.6 | 97.0 |
15 | Slash | Yes | 20.8 | 153.5 |
Pine trees have a significant commercial and ecological value in Australia. There is an increasing interest in measuring biomass of the pine trees. A forestry research institute collected data consisting of biomass measurements and other covariates for two species of pines, Loblolly and Slash. The data includes total tree above-stump biomass (TASB), diameter at 1.3 metres above ground, and the tree age. In addition, the researchers recorded whether or not each tree has been producing cones.
The data contains the following variables:
AgeAge of tree (years)
SpeciesTree species (Loblolly or Slash)
ConesProducing cones (Yes or No)
DiameterTree diameter at 1.3 m above ground (cm)
TASBTotal above-stump biomass (kg)
Question 1
The TASB is an example of a
nominal variable
discrete variable
continuous variable
categorical variable
Question 2
What proportion of pine trees have been producing cones?
0.426
0.447
0.553
0.574
Question 3
What is the observed number of loblolly trees producing cones?
12
13
20
27
Question 4
If there is no association between pine species and cone production, what is the expected count for the number of loblolly trees producing cones?
8.94
11.75
29.10
30.55
Question 5
What is the 2 statistic used to test for an association between pine species and cone production?
4.472
5.474
6.175
7.640
Question 6
Based on the statistic in Question 5, you can conclude that there is
moderate evidence to suggest that there is an association between pine species and cone production (p = 0.034)
weak evidence to suggest that there is an association between pine species and cone production (p = 0.083)
no evidence to suggest that there is an association between pine species and cone production (p = 0.581)
no evidence to suggest that there is an association between pine species and cone production (p = 0.966)
Question 7
The researchers want to determine whether pine trees that have been producing cones have a lower mean biomass and decide to use a Welch t-test to address this question. The result from this test suggests that there is
moderate evidence to suggest that mean biomass is lower for trees that have been producing cones (p = 0.038)
weak evidence to suggest that mean biomass is lower for trees that have been producing cones (p = 0.082)
no evidence to suggest that mean biomass is lower for trees that have been producing cones (p = 0.165)
no evidence to suggest that mean biomass is lower for trees that have been producing cones (p = 0.330)
Question 8
Which of the following is an assumption of the test in Question 7?
Linear relationship
Normal variability
Homogeneous variances
Equal standard deviations
Question 9
The researchers want to understand the relationship between biomass and tree age using a linear model. What is the slope of the least-squares line for the relationship between TASB and Age?
0.071 kg/year
3.699 kg/year
6.286 kg/year
33.492 kg/year
Question 10
Based on the least-squares line in Question 9, what is the estimated mean biomass of trees that are 9 years old?
4.34 kg
42.49 kg
56.57 kg
90.06 kg
Question 11
The researchers would like to extend this model to include the effects of tree diameter and species on biomass. What is the appropriate model they can use?
Multiple linear regression model
Two-way ANOVA model
Logistic regression model
One-way ANOVA model
Question 12
Based on the model in Question 11, you estimate that
holding the effect of age and diameter fixed, the mean biomass of slash pines is 19.820 kg higher than that of loblolly pines
holding the effect of age and diameter fixed, the mean biomass of slash pines is 27.220 kg higher than that of loblolly pines
holding the effect of age and diameter fixed, the mean biomass of slash pines is 27.220 kg lower than that of loblolly pines
holding the effect of age and diameter fixed, the mean biomass of slash pines is 19.820 kg lower than that of loblolly pines
Question 13
Based on the model in Question 11, the estimated mean biomass of loblolly pines that are 9 years old and have a diameter of 13.9 cm is
16.71 kg
36.53 kg
67.46 kg
87.28 kg
Question 14
Based on the model in Question 11, the residual for the first tree in the data is
-56.00 kg
-43.16 kg
-20.56 kg
10.37 kg
Question 15
Based on the model in Question 11, you can conclude that there is
strong evidence to suggest that there is an association between biomass and diameter, when holding the effects of tree species and age fixed (p = 0.002)
weak evidence to suggest that there is an association between biomass and diameter, when holding the effects of tree species and age fixed (p = 0.068)
weak evidence to suggest that there is an association between biomass and diameter, when holding the effects of tree species and age fixed (p = 0.089)
no evidence to suggest that there is an association between biomass and diameter, when holding the effects of tree species and age fixed (p = 0.368)
Question 16
A plot of residuals against fitted values for the model in Question 11 suggests that
the constant variance assumption is reasonable
the relationship between diameter and species is linear
the relationship between diameter and age is linear
the independence assumption is violated
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started