agraph Fact Scencario Geddy Construction (GC) was planning to bid a highway project in Ada, Oklahoma. The bid documents contained a standard site inspection clause advising bidders to become generally familiar with the site and include in their proposals all costs resulting from conditions observable at the site. The project manual (spec book) included boring logs indicating that no rock would be encountered at the design elevations. GC had ample opportunity prior to bid to visit the site or to conduct its own subsurface exploration, but declined to do so. Nevertheless, GC submitted a bid and was awarded the contract. Early in the project, GC encountered massive quantities of rock in those areas in which the boring logs indicated there was none. Question In his deposition, the president of GC in Fact Scenario A testified that if he had visited the job site before preparing his bid, he would not have changed a thing .. there was nothing observable from the site that indicated the presence of rock nor any other subsurface obstruction. With this new information, answer the following: Group of answer choices Since GC did not visit the site prior to bidding the work, it doesn't matter what he saw after he submitted his bid or how he testified. He waived any right to claim either a Type I or Type II changed condition. In addition to possibly being able to assert a Type I changed condition claim, GC might also be entitled to a Type II claim on account of the new information presented. Because there was nothing indicating the existence of rock or other subsurface conditions based on a plain observation of the site, GC might be entitled to a Type I changed condition claim. [ (Ctrl)