Alex was involved in an automobile accident. Percy was a passenger in his car and was seriously injured. At the time of the accident Alex was driving 30 miles over the speed limit. Alex lost control of his vehicle and crashed into a fire hydrant. Alex argues that he lost control of his car (which was manufactured by GM) because of a defect in the car's all-wheel drive system and not because of any negligence on his part. Percy has sued Alex and GM based on the following claims of negligence: Alex was negligent in the operation of his motor vehicle, and GM was negligent in the design and manufacture of Alex's car. Assume that the jury found that Percy has suffered $100,000 of damages and that Percy was 10% contributorily negligent for failing to wear a seat belt. The jury also found Alex was 80% negligent and GM 10% negligent. The accident occurred in Wisconsin and the trial took place in Wisconsin. Which of the following statements is correct? O A. Percy can recover $90,000 from Alex and GM in whatever proportions he elects. O B. Percy can only recover $80,000 because his negligence equaled that of one of the defendants. O C. Percy cannot recover anything from GM. O D. Percy can recover from Alex a maximum of $72,000. O E. Percy can recover from GM a maximum of $10,000.