Alexia is buying new furniture for the office. She visits the showroom at Impact Furniture, and selects some couches for the foyer and staff room, as well as a matching table and chairs. The couches and chairs are upholstered in fabric, rather than leather, and Alexia is concerned about spills staining the furniture. Before signing the contract, she asks the salesperson, Jane, whether the fabric is stain resistant, and Jane assures her that the fabric is pre-treated to repel any spills. Alexia is happy to hear that, and tells Jane that she would not have bought the furniture otherwise, particularly as it is expensive. Alexia signs the contract without reading it. The contract states that payment in full must be made on delivery of the furniture. The contract does not specify that the fabric is pre-treated and spill resistant. A visitor to Alexia's ofce spills their coffee all over one of the new couches in the foyer, and it is badly stained, ruining the fabric and making the couch unsuitable for use. Alexia may be able to establish that Jane's oral statement amounts to a collateral contract. Which of the following is CORRECT with respect to the collateral contract? Select one: Oa. Ob. 0c. 0d. The statement made by Jane must be promissory in nature and intended have contractual effect. Jane's promise can be a term of the collateral contract even if it is found to contradict the terms of the main contract if the circumstances are found to be exceptional. The parol evidence rule would prevent Alexia from establishing a collateral contract and her claim would be unsuccessful. Alexia agreeing to enter into the main contract is not good consideration for the collateral contract. Alexia must provide some additional consideration, even if it is nominal