Question
Alfred James is a world-renownedpainter and longtime Firm client,with his office at 1 Paint Street,Your City, Your State. Alfredcoordinated a meeting with HaroldCurbside, the Operations
Alfred James is a world-renownedpainter and longtime Firm client,with his office at 1 Paint Street,Your City, Your State. Alfredcoordinated a meeting with HaroldCurbside, the Operations Managerof Stantond Cars, Inc., a largeautomobile dealer with a repaircenter, with its office at 1 AutoAvenue, Your City, Your State. Priorto the meeting, The Firm formed abusiness for Alfred called JamesPaints, Inc. Alfred uses the businessto protect his intellectual propertyand any assets he creates andformulates. The purpose of themeeting was for Alfred to present anew paint that he developed tokeep cars cooler, prevent fading,and prevent chipping. Alfredoffered the product to StantondCars, Inc. in exchange for a fee of$500 per car on which the paint isapplied for a full paint job, and$100 per car for any touch upusage. The fees are paid monthly,on or before the 15th of eachmonth, with an accounting ofusage.The next year, after the contractwas completed, Alfred wascontacted by Harold, whoexpressed concern about severalemployees who work in the bodyshop at Stantond Cars, Inc. usingthe new paint, who developed aseries of medical problems,Including cancer. Alfred, throughhis business, purchased themanufactured paint from Sealco,Inc., located at 222 Safety Way,Your City, Your State. It turns outSealco, Inc. did not use Alfred'sformula for the paintmanufacturing, and, instead, usedlead-based products withoutAlfred's knowledge or consent.A month later, a lawsuit was filedby Vanessa Fox, a body shopworker at Stantond Cars, Inc., wholives at 567 West Street, Your City,Your State, for her injuries allegingthe paint as the cause of hercancer. Vanessa's attorney isHeniger Hemshaw, Esq, 4377 UsurpDrive, Your City, Your State.Alfred retains The Firm forrepresentation of James Paints, Inc.in the litigation, asking that TheFirm seek dismissal, since Alfredwas unaware of the change inmanufacturing specifications. AMotion to Dismiss is filed. The Firmrequests a special set hearing onthe motion. The motion is denied.After a few months of litigation,and to end the matter prior toadditional publicity or riskproduction of the trade secrets, thematter is resolved for $100,000.Alfred becomes concerned abouthis brand and decides to operatehis business as Coolco Paint, Inc.Who is the plaintiff ? Vanessa Fox or Alfred who filed the motion to dismiss and requested the Special Set Hearing? And how many defendants are? Numbers 3;4;6;7;8;9 ? Thanks
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started