alls we lawsuit, identify relevant claims and defenses. For each clai provide answer by applying the IRAC method. 1. Molly (Rhonda) v. City of Kingstown 2. Molly (Rhonda) v. John: strict liability tort because pit bulls are considered dangero dogs and john did not follow the statute by keeping ginger a leash but molly acted negligent by not keeping an eye on her daughter. 3. Dilbert v. Molly- 4. John v. Molly-molly intentionally threw her shoe at John's dog with the intent to harm since she bit Rhonda, but she could claim it was self- defense? 5. John v. Dilbert-Dilbert intentionally knocked ou John and locked him in the bathroom. He could claim self- defense because he was threatening Molly and Rhonda, but locking him in the bathroom was excessive. 6. Dilbert v. BMW (and collectable amount of damages, if any)- he was negligent and ignored the warning on the tire; he also was negligent in not abiding by the speed limit. 7. Dilbert v. Pedestrian and collectable amount of damages, if any)