Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Although its own operations have shown no growth over the past decade, Hammerworks Inc. has built up a significant cash balance ($2.9 billion) in anticipation

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
Although its own operations have shown no growth over the past decade, Hammerworks Inc. has built up a significant cash balance ($2.9 billion) in anticipation of a collapse in equity prices which it believes will create opportunities for valuable acquisitions. Following just such a correction, two potential targets are now being considered: Metallion has a current market capitalization of $1.1 billion, $550 million in 6% debt (YTM also 6%), and generates EBIT of $175 million annually with no growth (a 7.1% profit margin on annual sales of $1.4 billion). Goblikon has an enterprise value of $1.3 billion, a market valued D/E of 1.1, and has been growing its profits at 4% for the past several years (it currently has a P/E ratio of 10). In either case, Hammerworks would be expected to pay off the target's bond holders in full as there is a change of control clause in their bond indentures. Since either acquisition would be paid for with cash, the firm expects that either acquisition would increase EPS. All three firms face a tax rate of 30%, and Hammerworks' cost of equity is 8%. Assume there are no synergies from either acquisition but that a 10% premium would have to be paid above the market value of their shares. Hammerwork's CEO had the following to say: "Either transaction is an opportunity for Hammerworks to turn cash into increased EPS, which will boost the market value of its shares. By bringing either target under its management, it unlocks substantial value for shareholders concerned control clause in their bond indentures. Since either acquisition would be paid for with cash, the firm expects that either acquisition would increase EPS. All three firms face a tax rate of 30%, and Hammerworks' cost of equity is 8%. Assume there are no synergies from either acquisition but that a 10% premium would have to be paid above the market value of their shares. Hammerwork's CEO had the following to say: Either transaction is an opportunity for Hammerworks to turn cash into increased EPS, which will boost the market value of its shares. By bringing either target under its management, it unlocks substantial value for shareholders concerned about the leveraged capital structure of the targets. Also, since investors pay a premium for effective corporate governance and Hammerworks is widely deemed to have better control systems than either target, their P/E ratios should rise to match its own. Explain what is wrong with each of the CEO's three statements

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Micro Entrepreneurship And Micro Enterprise Development In Malaysia Emerging Research And Opportunities

Authors: Abdullah Al Mamun , Mohammad Nurul Huda Mazumder, Noor Raihani Zainol, Rajennd Muniady

1st Edition

1522584730,1522584757

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

How unique should a project be allowed to be?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Show the properties and structure of allotropes of carbon.

Answered: 1 week ago