Amelia's son told her that when he died he wanted his remains cremated and placed in a columbarium. They are Roman Catholic. The son died suddenly and was buried by Amelia in St. Mary's Cemetery under the rules and canons of the Roman Catholic Church. These canons prohibited the following: cremation, except in cases of great emergency; removal of bodies from a cemetery for cremation; and removal of a body from the cemetery without consent of the Archbishop of the Archdiocese of San Francisco. Five years later, Amelia sought to remove her son's body, claiming she made a mistake, was grief stricken, and was under the influence of the Roman Catholic Church at the time of his death and by reasons thereof failed to observe his wisher. She further claimed the prohibitions of the church were never called to her attention. The Church refused to allow removal, claiming they had no knowledge of the son's wishes, and that she agreed to the rules and canons at the time of the contracting for his burial. Please list the elements that must be proven for lack of consent. Should the court allow the removal? Why or why not. 4. Dairy Co. sells raw cream directly to the public. Maxwell gets sick after consuming some of Fairy Co.'s raw cream. Maxwell sues Dairy Co. and argues that the raw cream is a "good" under the definition in Division 2 of the Commercial Code (UCC) and, therefore, the provisions of Division 2 apply to the contract. Dairy Co. argues that the raw cream is not a "good" and, therefore, the common law of contracts applies. Which provisions (of the UCC, or other laws) do you think Maxwell is applying in this case? Who wins, and why