Amy and Hank were involved in an automobile accident. Amy's car, worth $10,000, was destroyed. Hank suffered no personal injuries or property damage. The case went to court and a jury determined that Amy was 30 percent at fault and Hank was 70 percent at fault. Under what legal theory would Amy be able to recover $7,000 from Hank? Res ipsa loquitur Contributory negligence Comparative negligence Negligence per se