Amy runs a business that supplies restaurants with linens. She calls ABC Restaurant and asks the owner for the business of supplying linens to the restaurant. The owner explains that she already has a contract with XYZ Linens that will not explie for another $6$ months. Amy convinces the owner, however, to immediately drop the contract with XYZ because Amy can supply linens on a much less expensive basis. Which of the following is true regarding any cause of action of XYZ against Amy?

Multiple Choice

XYZ Linens may have a cause of action against the restaurant owner but does not have a cause of action against Amy

XYZ Linens has a cause of action against Amy for "disparagement."

XYZ Linens has a cause of action against Amy for "business interruption."

$.$ XYZ Linens has a cause of action against Amy for "interference with contract"