An article in the Economist in 2016 noted that since 2000, an investor in the United Kingdom would have eamed a higher return from buying British government bonds than from buying stock issued by British firms. The article concluded that "There has been a negative equity risk premium this century." Sourcen: "Stocks for the Long Run?" Economist, January 13, 2016. Equity premium represents the additional Why might the equity risk premium in the I A. The retums on bonds outpaced the mu B. Banks were paying high interest ra C. Investors fled to other countries. D. The returns on stocks outpaced the retuetm urcudrus. D. The returns on stocks outpaced the returirs uit vurnus. conomist in 2016 noted that since 2000, an investor in the United Kingdom would have earned a higher return from buying suying stock issued by British firms. The article concluded that: "There has been a negative equity risk premium this century. or the Long Run?" Economist, January 13, 2016. represents the additional investors must_ in order to invest in equity risk premium in the United Kingdom have been ni seriod? urns on bonds outpaced the returns on stocks. were paying high interest rates on bonds. ors fled to other countries. turns on stocks outpaced the returns on bonds. 2016 noted that since 2000, an investor in the United Kingdom would have earned a higher return from buying Britis issued by British firms. The article concluded that: "There has been a negative equity risk premium this century." un?" Economist, January 13, 2016. emium in the United Kingdom have been negative during this period? Is outpaced the returns on stocks. high interest rates on bonds. ier countries. cks outpaced the returns on bonds