an easy way to say: The heart of the argument of this paper lies in a critique of the existing transnational corporations (TNCs) and the role of various governments as enablers of social and environmental violence, but it is important to recognize the efforts made to encourage people to live sustainable lives and business practices to be more eco-friendly. One example is how "creating new systems of energy, transportation and architectural design, and reengineering productive processes" can lead to capitalism reducing environmental abuses (Harris 63). The importance of this may show how the structural functioning of capitalism can incentivize "alternative and sustainable energy as a major transformative technology" (Harris 63). This could have numerous benefits, including governments acting globally to preserve the environment and TNCs creating flexible business models that accommodate gradual transformations. For example, governmental stimulation of the solar energy sector has led these types of TNCs to compete with the oil and coal industries (Harris 70) while encouraging international investments. Yet, even with these changes, Harris points to a flaw within capitalism that seems to create issues: business consolidation