An excellent strategy is to answer each questions using IRAC:

Issue - What is the legal issue that must be answered to resolve the legal dispute?

Rule - When reading through the fact pattern, what is the general legal rule that should be applied? Identify any exceptions to the general rule.

Analysis - Application of the legal rule to the key facts of the case. Key facts are facts that if changed, would also change the legal outcome of the case. Key facts should match an element of a crime or cause of action. If there are exceptions to a general rule or law that are relevant to the facts, state it in your "analysis" section of your answer.

Conclusion - After applying the facts to your legal cause of action .

Defective product and failure to warn of the danger

1.When Mary Bresnahan drove her Chrysler LeBaron, she sat very close to the steering wheelless than a foot away from the steering-wheel enclosure of the driver's-side air bag. At the time, Chrysler did not provide any warning that a driver should not sit close to the air bag. When Bresnahan became involved in an accident with another car, Bresnahan's air bag deployed. The bag caused her elbow to strike the windshield pillar and fracture in three places, resulting in repeated surgery and physical therapy. Bresnahan filed a suit in a California state court against Chrysler to recover for her injuries, alleging in part that they were caused by Chrysler's failure to warn consumers about sitting near the air bag. At the trial, an expert testified that the air bag was not intended to prevent arm injuries, which were "a predictable, incidental consequence" of the bag's deploying. Should Chrysler pay for Bresnahan's injuries? Why or why not?