An inventor sued a company for patent infringement. At the close of the trial, the company made a motion for judgment as a matter of law, arguing that the inventor's evidence was insufficient to establish the elements of her claim. The court denied the motion. When the jury returned a verdict in favor of the inventor, the company renewed its motion for judgment as a matter of law. In addition to the renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, the company also moved for a new trial, asserting that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The court denied both motions. If the company appeals the denials of both the renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and the motion for a new trial, what is the appropriate standard of review