An officer saw a male that the officer thought appeared suspicious. The officer couldn't say why he thought the man was suspicious, he just had a hunch. The officer stopped the man, searched him, and found drugs and arrested him. These drugs were illegally obtained. During questioning, the man made incriminating statements. Based on the statements made, the police officer applied for a search warrant to search the man's house and a search warrant was obtained where a meth lab was discovered. The man sought to exclude the evidence of the meth lab as a violation of his 4th Amendment rights. What is the likely result? O None of the choices. The evidence of the meth lab will be inadmissible as "fruit of the poisonous tree" due to the illegal arrest. The evidence of the meth lab will be admissible because of exigent circumstances. The evidence of the meth lab will be admissible because there was a valid search warrant.