An organization monitors many aspects of elementary and secondary education in a very large country. Their 2000 numbers are often used as a baseline to assess changes. In 2000, 36% of students had not been absent from school even once during the previous month. In the 2005 survey, responses from 7423 randomly selected students showed that this figure had slipped to 34%. Officials would, of course, be concerned if student attendance were declining. Do these figures give evidence of a change in student attendance? Consider an event to be rare if its probability of occurring is less than 0.10. Complete parts a-e below. The P-value is . (Round to three decimal places as needed.) d) State your conclusion. the null hypothesis. These figures change in student attendance. sufficient evidence to conclude that there has been a e) Do you think this difference is meaningful? Explain. Choose the correct answer below. OA. The difference is meaningful because even though the difference is small, all differences, no matter how small, are meaningful if the test results are significant. OB. The difference is probably not meaningful because it is not statistically significant and is likely too small to have practical implications. OC. The difference is meaningful because it is statistically significant and large in size, making it very likely to have practical implications. OD. The difference is statistically significant, but it may not be meaningful because it is possibly too small to have practical implications.