Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Analysis Delhi High Court's decision in Starbucks v. SardarBuksh case in favour of Starbucks is unbiased and justified. The coffee house has not been ordered

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
Analysis Delhi High Court's decision in Starbucks v. SardarBuksh case in favour of Starbucks is unbiased and justified. The coffee house has not been ordered any shut down or heavy penalty but the simple amendments in the change of its name and the logo to avoid any confusion among the customers. While Starbucks has been in existence since 1971, and has registered its name and logo in 2001, SardarBuksh is a relatively a new brand. The decision was taken under The Trademarks Act, 1999, with the consensus of both the plaintiff and the defendant. The defendant was also provided with enough time of 2 months as per their demands to make necessary changes. Therefore, when two marks are put next to each other, if they cause confusion or mislead the viewers, they would be deceptively similar and therefore cannot be registered. Thus, SardarBuksh is now called Sardarji-Bakhsh Coffee & Co

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Exceptions From EU Free Movement Law Derogation Justification And Proportionality

Authors: Panos Koutrakos, Niamh Nic Shuibhne, Phil Syrpis

1st Edition

1509928863, 978-1509928866

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Supreme Court

Answered: 1 week ago