Analyze this case on the sale of goods to minors (infants) using the IRAC Method (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) by answering the following questions.

824 S.W.2d 545

Joseph Eugene DODSON, a minor, by his next friend Gene

DODSON, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

Burns SHRADER, Jr., and Mary Shrader, individually and d/b/a

Shrader's Auto Sales, Defendant/Appellant.

Supreme Court of Tennessee,

at Nashville.

Jan. 27, 1992

1.Identifying information:

oCitation for the case:

oParties:

oCourt:

oProcedural history:

oDate of the decision:

2.Issue: [What is at issue in this case?

3.Rule:[In this case the Supremes create a new rule for Tennessee.These questions guide you through the opinion to show how they arrived at the new rule.]

• Case of first impression in Tennessee and when was it decided? What rule did they apply?
• Evolution of the case law
• Evolution ofthe law in Tennessee:
• Evolution of the law in other states ("infancy doctrine"):

1.The Benefit Rule, including the states using this rule:

2.The other minority rule, including the states using this rule:

3.Changes in society which influenced the Tennessee Supreme Court:

4.The Oregon rule and case cited for this rule:

• The rule that the Tennessee Supreme Court adopted:
• Court justification for using this rule in terms of public policy:

4. Analysis:Once the Tennessee Supreme Court adopts the rule, they analyze the facts in this case.Copy and paste the paragraph which was their analysis of this case?

5. Conclusion and decision of the court [from a legal standpoint, where does this case go next and what is supposed to happen in that court]?