and then make their final choice among the brands that remain, using the multi$-$attribute model. ${?}^{47}$

Evaluations of brands as good or bad based on information

Importance weight of this retrieved from memory or generated through external attribute based on needs, search $(5=$ very good on this attribute; $1=$ not at all good values, goals $($higher score on this attribute$).$ means more important: weights add up to $100).$

$\backslash$table$[[$Evaluative criteria,A$,$B$,$C$,$D$,$E$,$Importance$],[$Cost$,5,3,4,4,2,35],[$Size$,3,4,5,4,3,25],[$Location$,5,5,5,2,5,20],[$View$,1,3,1,4,1,15],[$Has a pool,$3,3,4,3,5,5]]$

Apartment chosen based on the:

Compensatory model $($sum of Eval $$ Imp$)q,$

Conjunctive model $($set minimum cutoff of $2)q,$

Disjunctive model $($set acceptable cutoff of $3)q,$

Lexicographic model $($compare on EC in order of Imp$)$

Elimination$-$bv$-$aspects model $($set acceptable cutoff of $3)$