and therefore only US law can apply. Also, AC and Festival claim that an 'exclusive jurisdiction clause' in favour of the United States District Courts for the Central District of California and a 'class action waiver clause' in the contract prevent Miss Good-Show and her fellow claimants from making any claims in an Australian court or under the Australian Consumer Law. Festival also refer to a term in the cruise contract providing: 'Festival Group and all its subsidiaries will not be subject to the consumer law guarantees of states outside of the USA'. Advise Miss Good-Show and her fellow passengers whether those clauses will be considered fair under the Australian Consumer Law and whether they may have a claim under the Australian Consumer Law's 'consumer guarantees'. Please use case law and/or statute to support your